I used both quantitative and qualitative data in my research. For my quantitative data I used a pretest and posttest. I used the scores from the previous week's comprehension test (without the treatment) and compared them to the comprehension test to a new story (with the treatment). This helped me determine if VoiceThread was useful in helping students comprehension level increase. Even though there was a small increase it was not significant enough to show that it helped their comprehension level. For Qualitative data I used a Self-Assessment survey and observation notes. I chose to do a self assessment survey based on time it was easier than interviewing 23 students. The self assessment survey was also better than written responses based on my grade level. Students were able to circle the smiley face based on how they felt about the question. There were five questions on the survey about VoiceThread and working as a group. The questions were:
1. How did you feel about using the digital tool to retell the story? 2. How did you feel about working in a group? 3. How do you feel this helped you remember the story? 4. How do you fell you and your group did on retelling the story? 5. How would you feel about doing this again? Students were also given a choice to write a sentence or two about why they answered the way they did. Only eight students responded with a sentence (one was not legible). This helped me determine if students enjoyed the using the tool and working in groups, and how it affects their intrinsic motivation. Question number 5 showed that almost half of the students did not enjoy using the digital tool. I also took observations and noticed that one group did not like working together and this showed their disinterest in the project.
3 Comments
Jane Gallagher
11/27/2017 06:51:15 pm
I too feel the surveys were very helpful. My students are being honest and giving real feedback. I like the idea of smile faces for the young students. Our studies are for such a short time, but I feel they provide a small window into a bigger picture. I have been curious about
Reply
stephanie jones
11/27/2017 10:31:00 pm
My topic was similar and showed similar results when looking at my whole class. When I looked at subgroups I saw more growth with my urgent intervention students than those students who were able to read grade level text. Do you think that the technology piece was distracting for your grade level students or was it more about doing group work? I don't know about you but I would be interested in modifying my research project to see if the results improve. I believe that as educators we need to find the right technology tools to engage our students as well as support them. I guess we will have to keep trying until we reach the significant growth category.
Reply
Madeleine O'Rear
11/29/2017 06:45:29 pm
I wonder if your study would show more growth if it had been carried out over a longer amount of time. I feel like it is hard to judge how effective something is with only one week to study it. My data also showed a small amount of growth, but not enough to be statistically significant. But I think, that with more time, the strategy you used, as well as the one I used, would be more effective. I feel like introducing something new into a classroom setting is always going to create some disturbance at first.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am a second grade teacher at Sierra Vista K-8 Archives
November 2017
Categories |